As the 2004 election approaches, the United States is the world�s greatest dichotomy. America stands as an unparalleled world superpower, flexing military and economic might which touches every corner of the globe. By almost every measure, the U.S. dominates the globe.
Unfortunately, many Americans are not reaping the benefits of our national bounty. Millions of people–many working full-time–live in poverty. Over the past three years two million jobs have disappeared. Many workers have settled for jobs far below their capabilities, because that�s the best they can find. Health care, prescription, and college costs are skyrocketing. Many families live paycheck to paycheck, teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, unable to save for retirement.
Today America nears a crossroad. This November we will chart our government’s course for the next four years. Will we continue down the rocky, laissez-faire path we are traveling? Or will we forge trail which seeks to tap into the potential of all Americans, not just the privileged and the powerful?
Over the past few months I’ve examined the field of presidential candidates, trying to decide who I think is best suited to lead our nation toward a brighter, more-inclusive future. For the reasons outlined below, I support Senator John Edwards for president.
The Problem
Four years ago when he campaigned for president, George Bush promised many things. He claimed he would bring economic prosperity, that he would change the tone in Washington, that he would unite people rather than divide them. He offered the vision of a “humble” foreign policy in which the U.S. refrained from entangling nation building.
Nothing could have been further from the truth. On the international front, the Bush administration squandered a vast reservoir of post-9/11 goodwill by implementing a hardheaded preemptive policy which landed us in Iraq. On the domestic front, George Bush has failed to show any leadership on the economy or health care. He operates like a disinterested CEO, rubber stamping whatever industry lobbyists, corporate cronies, political strategists, or hardcore ideologues pass his way. Consequently, the federal budget and deficit are exploding, corporations have free reign to behave irresponsibly, our environment is deteriorating, and more and more people abroad dislike America.
Clearly, America can’t continue in this direction. We need a new executive.
The Candidates
For the first time since 1992, I began my assessment of the presidential candidates with a clean slate. Given the large field of capable candidates, it took me a few months to select a favorite. I spent many hours watching C-SPAN, news channels, and gathering information on the Internet. Each candidate has unique strengths. Wesley Clark is a bright leader with strong foreign policy credentials. I appreciate the energy and grassroots efforts of Howard Dean’s campaign, and, to some degree, his candid message. John Kerry is an articulate candidate who has an outstanding record of public service. Joe Lieberman is a strong champion of economic growth and traditional American values.
But over time Senator Edwards emerged as a clear favorite. I appreciate his personal story, his vision for America, his stance on the issues, and the way he has conducted his campaign. I believe he is the candidate who can and will pull our nation out of the doldrums.
The Story
To fully appreciate Senator Edwards’ vision for America, it’s important to view his positions in the context of his life experience. Unlike other candidates, he wasn�t born into a wealthy family. Instead, he�s the son of a mill worker who, thorough determination and hard work, became the first in his family to graduate from college. Although he has since became a successful attorney and no longer struggles to get by, he claims that has never forgotten where he came from. And watching the way he interacts with all types of people along the campaign trail, I�m inclined to believe him. He passionately discusses our nation’s moral duty to lift every American out of poverty.
More importantly, you can see the influence of his upbringing in his economic package, which is carefully crafted to assist working class America.
The Issues
Senator Edwards’ major positions are available in his comprehensive, 64-page policy outline, “Real Solutions for America.” Here are some highlights:
- Jobs
- Ensure that trade deals are fair and have strong labor and environmental protections.
- Enforce existing trade agreements.
- Offer tax incentives for corporations to keep jobs in America, rather than shipping them abroad.
- Enact the Rural Economic Advancement Challenge fund to bring venture capital and management expertise to entrepreneurs and small businesses in small towns and areas that are losing jobs today.
- Increase in the minimum wage by at least $1.50/hour.
- Health Care
- Provide refundable tax credits so parents can insure their children.
- A Small Business Support Program will give small businesses access to a range of high-quality health plans for their employees.
- Use the federal government’s power to reduce drug costs.
- Offer incentives to attract more workers to nursing.
- Eliminate Medicare mismanagement and waste.
- Invest in accessible primary care medical clinics.
- Education
- Increase teacher pay, particularly in areas with poor school districts.
- Expand Head Start.
- “College for Everyone” proposal will provide one year of free tuition to public universities and community colleges for any academically-qualified student who works 10 or more hours per week.
- Taxation
- Proposed American Dream Tax Credit offers a matching tax credit of up to $5,000 to help those who need it to cover a down payment on a first home.
- Matching savings accounts for retirement plan would allow a working family who saved from age 25 to retirement to accumulate a nest egg of $200,000 through tax credits, on top of other savings.
- Repeal of the Bush tax cuts for those earning $240,000 or more per year.
- Equalizing the tax rates for capital gains, dividends, and investments with those of earned income, so that middle class workers do not pay a higher tax rate than those receiving passive income.
- Foreign Policy
- Expand the size and scope of an international peacekeeping force in Afghanistan.
- Bring more nations and institutions into rebuilding Iraq.
- Strengthen America’s commitment to the Biological Weapons Convention and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, increase support for the dismantling and safeguarding of weapons-grade materials in Russia and the former Soviet states, and work with allies to solve urgent proliferation threats such as North Korea.
- Revitalize institutions like NATO and the United Nations.
- Take a more aggressive role in promoting peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
- Define how America uses its power–whether its defending against threats, promoting prosperity and freedom, or giving help to those who need it.
- National Security
- Maintain a strong commitment to national defense and our military personnel.
- Shift domestic intelligence responsibilities away from the FBI and into a new Homeland Intelligence Agency.
- Improve security at America’s borders, seaports, and step up protection at chemical and nuclear facilities.
- Provide greater funding for first responders.
Edwards v. Bush
A candidate can have the best policy platform in the world, but it all goes for naught if he or she isn�t elected. Senator Edwards is best equipped of all the Democratic contenders to defeat George Bush for the following reasons:
(1) Positive message: Edwards has run an optimistic campaign founded on the hope and potential of every American. This is a stark contrast to George Bush’s cynical, fear-based, orange-alert campaign which promotes the right wing�s politically divisive, every-man-for-himself agenda
The 20th century’s two most noted Democratic presidents–FDR and Kennedy–where largely successful due to their ability to inspire the nation. Americans can overcome great challenges if they are motivated to respond with a clear purpose. Edwards has the potential to this type of president. He can use the Oval Office to lead us in achieving a unifying national mission. Not merely as a forum to peddle vacations and shopping sprees.
(2) National campaign: Undoubtedly any of the Democratic contenders can poll well in the Northeast and along the West Coast. But to win in November, the Democratic nominee must be competitive in the South, or at least in the border states. I wish this weren�t the case, but the fact is that it will be very difficult for any of the New England candidates to challenge Bush in states such as Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee, or North Carolina. Edwards has a real shot of winning at least two of those states and challenge Bush in several others.
(3) “Likeability“: Sometimes I wish America was a country where everyone is a policy wonk who make political choices using elaborate decision matrices. But it’s not. When selecting a presidential candidate, many Americas are swayed by subjective factors�first impressions, media buzz, gut feelings. For some, the presidential quandary boils down to a simple question: Who do I like? Who can I trust?
Judged on this count, Edwards scores very well. His charisma, coupled with his upbeat message, brings energy to any audience. And because his presentation is grounded in the issues ordinary voters are most concerned about, he connects with average Americans.
(4) Tough Campaigner: A presidential campaign is a marathon, not a sprint. A successful candidate must have the energy, passion, and discipline to go the distance.
I’ve been impressed in what I’ve seen from Edwards out on trail. He appears to be a tireless campaigner, attending five or six events a day, yet claiming, convincingly, that he�s having “the time of my life.” He performs well in both large and small venues. The senator effectively weaves his personal experience and his policy objectives into a stump speech which James Carville recently described as being the best he’s ever seen; a notable complement coming from the former Clinton campaign guru.
Edwards is quick on his feet. In voter question and answer sessions along the campaign trail, he really appears to make an effort to address individual voter concerns. Many candidates lazily respond to questions merely by popping off with pre-packaged talking points. But Edwards does a lot better job at connecting with the voter.
This skill is key on the debate platform. Imagine the following scene: this October two parties will be summoned to argue their case for the presidency in front of the greatest jury in the world–the American public. On the right stands a scripted, disinterested candidate, fresh off a season of reading the tele-prompter at ticketed events. On the left stands a skilled orator and long-time advocate who has spent the past year laying out his vision for America, face-to-face in front of average voters.
Which candidate would you want representing you? Case closed.
The Challenge
I invite you to join me in supporting Senator Edwards. Become part of the solution, not part of the problem.
Campaign debate platform, 2004 campaign. Edwards vs. Bush.
Edwards is a multimillionaire trial lawyer, IIRC. If Edwards doesn’t hand Skippy his privy member shredded into tiny pieces at the end of the debate, then Edwards doesn’t deserve to be President. Case closed there.
Not that I’m worried about that; I’m of the opinion that Charlie McCarthy could clean Bush’s clock in a debate, even though Edgar Bergen is dead.
Funny Len… how come Al Gore did so poorly in the debates?
And Brian… I can’t imagine I inspired you to get on the Edwards bandwagon 😉
Al Gore was a multimillionaire trial lawyer sometime in his career? That’s news to me; all of the biographies I’ve seen indicate that he went from Vanderbilt straight to Congress; looks like his career has pretty well been politics, politics and more politics.
Busted. A couple weeks ago I decided I would rely exclusively on Up for Anything for my political opinions, and it didn’t take long for CJ to catch me!
😉 Yeah, I figured as much…
Brian, I am glad to find out that you support the same Democratic candidate that I do! For some reason, I thought John Edwards would be your choice….I’m so excited about this upcoming election, you’d think I was running for president! I just can’t wait to get Bush out of there! I look forward to reading more of your election comments.
Presidential Endorsement
People have started endorsing their candidates. Mr. and Mrs. Bubba are for Clark. William is for Edwards. Brian is too. Who do I endorse? Glad…
Vote Edwards
Damn. Just as I was getting used to the idea of John Kerry being our nominee we get a bimbo eruption. Boyi in Hong Kong filed an article that showed up on the Living in China aggregator titled “Hillary Clinton…