Salon has an article on Sibel Edmonds’ allegations of missed 9/11 warnings and the administration cover up (an earlier post on this here):
A former FBI wiretap translator with top-secret security clearance, who has been called “very credible” by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, has told Salon she recently testified to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States that the FBI had detailed information prior to Sept. 11, 2001, that a terrorist attack involving airplanes was being plotted.
Referring to the Homeland Security Department’s color-coded warnings instituted in the wake of 9/11, the former translator, Sibel Edmonds, told Salon, “We should have had orange or red-type of alert in June or July of 2001. There was that much information available.” Edmonds is offended by the Bush White House claim that it lacked foreknowledge of the kind of attacks made by al-Qaida on 9/11. “Especially after reading National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice [Washington Post Op-Ed on March 22] where she said, we had no specific information whatsoever of domestic threat or that they might use airplanes. That’s an outrageous lie. And documents can prove it’s a lie.”
. . .
“President Bush said they had no specific information about Sept. 11, and that’s accurate,” says Edmonds. “But there was specific information about use of airplanes, that an attack was on the way two or three months beforehand and that several people were already in the country by May of 2001. They should’ve alerted the people to the threat we’re facing.”
Edmonds testified before 9/11 commission staffers in February for more than three hours, providing detailed information about FBI investigations, documents and dates. This week Edmonds attended the commission hearings and plans to return in April when FBI Director Robert Mueller is scheduled to testify. “I’m hoping the commission asks him real questions — like, in April 2001, did an FBI field office receive legitimate information indicating the use of airplanes for an attack on major cities? And is it true that through an FBI informant, who’d been used [by the Bureau] for 10 years, did you get information about specific terrorist plans and specific cells in this country? He couldn’t say no,” she insists.
This is story is now going to be hard to ignore.
Greetings,
That is if it breaches the radar of CNN and the networks three. Forget it ever coming to light on FoxNews…
–jeff-perado
If Sibel Edmond’s story begins to get picked up by the media, and she has documentation, names, dates, places, ie. unimpeachable evidence, she can expect an all out effort to discredit her and her veracity. The administration feels that it’s attack dogs have discredited Richard Clarke by screaming lier Lier LIER LIER!!!! The basis of their claims is that what is in his book is not consistent with what is in classified documents that they have not seen! Either Clarke is the best lier that I have ever seen, as well as having the most elaborate conspiracy in the history of the world, or the man is a truthful patriot and preforming the greatest service to the nation. Sibel Edmonds, I hope you are ready, because the attacks are coming. Thank You for your service to the nation.