Details are still emerging, but it appears the just-released U.S. Supreme Court decision does allow those held in concentration camps some access to challange their charges in U.S. courts.
UPDATE: In Rumsfeld v. Padilla, the court did not reach the constitutional issue. It merely ruled that Padilla had pursued his legal claim in the wrong court.
UPDATE: In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the court ruled that due process demands that a combatant be given an opportunity to challange the government in front of a “neutral decisionmaker.
These rulings aren’t a complete victory for individual rights–Congress can authorize the president to hold a narrow class of combatents. But they are, by and large, a blow to the Bush administration’s claim of authority to hold prisoners indefinitely without the right for them to be heard.
UPDATE: Lawrence Solum has a more complete rundown on the detention cases.