Extending the USA Patriot Act

President Bush wants to make the USA Patriot Act permanent, but as the ACLU points out, some of the provisions of that law are unnecessary and unconstitutional:

Among the provisions of the Patriot Act scheduled to sunset is the controversial Section 215, which allows the FBI to obtain orders for the production of any “tangible things” (which can include library, travel, genetic, health, business or firearms records) without any meaningful standard of judicial review and no mechanism for the person affected to challenge the order.
This provision has been challenged by the ACLU in a federal lawsuit as violating Americans’ First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. Last year, Attorney General John Ashcroft said Section 215 has not been used, raising the question of why the Bush Administration believes such sweeping law enforcement powers are essential for the war on terrorism.

As this recently-revealed incident highlights, one of the most effective defenses against terrorism is something much simpler than a complex network of government snooping:

A month before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, U.S. Customs officials at an airport in Orlando refused entry to a young Saudi man who authorities now suspect may have been arriving to meet Mohamed Atta, leader of the suicide hijacking plot, government sources said yesterday.
The man, identified only as “al Qahtani,” attempted to enter the United States in early August 2001, officials said, but was turned back by Customs officials, who grew suspicious when he said he planned to visit friends in this country but could not name them.

If true, this event illustrates that alert, front-line authorities with good instincts may be the best weapon to against terrorist plots. Recall that a 2000 terrorist attack was foiled when a suspicious-looking driver was apprehended at the Washington/Canadian border.
Instead of issuing the government permanent blanket authority to rummage through the private information of law-abiding Americans, we should be holding law enforcement and intelligence officials accountable in using the constitutional law enforcement tools they already have.

Evolving Rhetoric

Calpundit provides a time line for the Bush administration’s rhetorical evolution on the Iraqi threat :

March 2003: Weapons of mass destruction.
June 2003: Weapons of mass destruction programs.
October 2003: Weapons of mass destruction-related programs.
January 2004: Weapons of mass destruction-related program activities.

Do you think the American public would have been so gung ho about launching a war against “weapons of mass destruction-related program activities”?
I guess that on paper Iraq did pose a “grave” danger to the United States. All it lacked was a delivery system to launch its weapons program activities against America.

Early Voting

Early voting for the Tennessee primary begins today. Information on Knox County polling locations and hours is available here (.pdf).
Stay tuned for the official Resonance candidate endorsement.

Tennessee Legislative Prediction

I predict the state legislature will grapple with the issue of nursing home safety:

A fire at a retirement home for the elderly killed three and at least 12 others were injured late Tuesday, a Blount County Sheriff’s spokeswoman said.
. . .
The fire comes four months after a blaze at a four-story nursing home in Nashville killed 15 residents either during the fire in the months that followed. Eight people died immediately after the Sept. 25 fire at the NHC Nashville HealthCare Center.

In another bold move, I predict it will be cold tomorrow in Manitoba.

Possible Explanation

Perhaps this explains Governor Dean’s unusual display following the Iowa caucus–he was trying to draw in some of the newly-registered voters.
Speaking of which, match each of these frequently-used media descriptions with the proper candidate:

Candidates:
Bush
Dean
Descriptions:
Angry
Confident
Determined
Impassioned
Rage
Resolved