Evolving Standards

Surprise. Notwithstanding its own prior bans on the importation of beef from countries with mad cows, the U.S. government wants the world to buy U.S. beef now:

The United States wants the world to start buying its beef again, after discovery of its first case of mad cow disease in late December, an uncommonly quick resumption of trade for nations wary of the brain-wasting disease.
. . .
U.S. officials acknowledge they are asking for more flexibility from trading partners than the United States showed in the past. They say international standards have evolved as scientists learn more about BSE and how to control it.
“So, in fact, while we may have been part of the problem in the past, we have taken a very active role in terms of trying to change that standard,” said Ron DeHaven, USDA’s chief veterinary officer, during a news conference on Wednesday.

Canada has a mad cow and we ban their imports for months, but when we have a mad cow everyone else is supposed to continue buying our beef without interruption . . . because we say so.
It’s nice being able to write the rules as you go along, isn’t it? Any question why other governments are getting tired of our act?

New Year’s Blog Resolutions

These are attainable–in theory, if not in practice.

  • Better proofreading–I try to spell check and all, but I sometimes miss stuff.
  • Diversify—Read and link to a wider array of blogs.
  • Less copy and paste–More writing, less block quoting.

War on Pollution

Shocking as it may seem, President Bush’s voluntary pollution control efforts don’t seem to having much of an impact:

Two years after President Bush declared he could combat global warming without mandatory controls, the administration has launched a broad array of initiatives and research, yet it has had little success in recruiting companies to voluntarily curb their greenhouse gas emissions, according to official documents, reports and interviews.
At the heart of the president’s strategy is “Climate Leaders,” a program that recruits the nation’s industrial polluters to voluntarily devise ways to curb their emissions by 10 percent or more in the coming decade. Scientists believe these greenhouse gas emissions, which include carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, are contributing to a troubling rise in the earth’s temperature that could disrupt weather patterns and cause flooding.
Only a tiny fraction of the thousands of U.S. companies with pollution problems — 50 in all — have joined Climate Leaders, and of the companies that have signed up, only 14 have set goals. Many of the companies that are volunteering say they did so either because reducing emissions makes good economic sense or because they were being nudged by state and federal regulators.

Who could have ever imagined that the worst polluters–power and utility companies–would simply ignore taking costly steps to curb pollution? Accordingly, it’s been “business as usual” with little change:

The president’s more immediate goal, announced on Valentine’s Day 2002, is to reduce greenhouse gas intensity — the amount of gas put into the atmosphere per unit of economy — by 18 percent over the next 10 years. Congress’s research arm, the General Accounting Office, concluded in October that Bush’s plan would reduce overall emissions only 2 percentage points below what the nation would achieve with no federal program whatsoever.

You can’t fault the administration for trying, however. Just look at all the resources they’re pouring into the effort:

Although Climate Leaders represents the cutting edge of Bush’s strategy, it has a budget of $1 million a year and a full-time staff of three, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, which runs the program.

A staff of three? To run a national program? Overwhelming.
There’s a real opportunity for the Democrats to make the environment an issue this fall if they know how to run with it.

Celebrating New Year’s Day

Practices vary widely:

South African police will crack down hard on anybody throwing old fridges from high-rise buildings during the New Year’s holiday, they say.
Police and soldiers are on patrol in Johannesburg’s notorious Hillbrow suburb, famous for the practice.
Throwing heavy objects from balconies and firing guns have become something of a bad “New Year’s institution,” said police Inspector Kriben Naidoo.
Revellers have been killed in the past after being hit by stray bullets.
It is not clear why Hillbrow residents have taken to seeing in the New Year by throwing objects such as fridges, microwave ovens, beds, rubbish bins and condoms out of their windows.
Some also aim their New Year fireworks horizontally, so they go from one high-rise apartment into another.

For my part, I’ll watch some college football, which should be a bit safer.

Resonance Year-End Review

As a year concludes, it’s customary for people to look back and review what happened. So I thought it appropriate to chronicle Resonance’s 2003 highlights.
Back on January 1, 2003, Resonance looked like this. It remained in this void, formless, yet error-free state for four months.
On April 23, Blogger Resonance was born with little fanfare. Initially it had no blogroll, no comments, and no readers. But over time it cultivated a small, confused audience. By late summer, literally dozens of Internet users had locked their browsers in on Resonance.
On September 29, the present Movable Type Resonance was launched. Three days later the site officially went public by hosting the Volunteer Tailgate Party.
Since then search engines have kicked in and site traffic has increased every month. Thanks to everyone who’s deliberately stopped by this year.
As we peer into the uncharted expanse of 2004, Resonance stands posed to make some sort of statement in the new year. Stay tuned to find out what kind of statement that is.