Congressional Bribery?

If Bob Novak’s Thanksgiving column on Rep. Nick Smith can be believed, someone should be in trouble:

Marc Miller, a Washington attorney who advises clients on ethics issues, told Chatterbox that what Novak described not only looked like “a slam-dunk violation of the bribery law” but probably also included “a smorgasbord of other criminal violations.” Rep. Smith, Miller said, “should really be sharing the specifics with the Justice Department.”

[sarcasm]I’m sure a DOJ investigation is already underway.[/sarcasm]

Stripping Sells Music

Who would have thought?

Pop princess Britney Spears, aided by a publicity blitzkrieg, steamrollered to number one on the music charts on Wednesday, while a new album by scandal-plagued Michael Jackson failed to make the Top 10, the Nielsen Soundscan sales tracking service said.
. . .
To promote the album, the 21-year-old Spears has seemed omnipresent recently, posing scantily clad for magazine covers, appearing in several television interviews and causing a major stir by kissing Madonna during the MTV Video Music Awards.

Meanwhile, even Jack Nicholson has taken notice of Britney:

AGEING playboy Jack Nicholson wants to bed Britney Spears � but says he is �too old� for sex.
The 66-year-old actor believes a romp with the singer, 22 today, would be “life-altering.”

Interesting thought.

Conflicting Stories

Who’s telling the truth?

U.S. commanders said Monday they had killed up to 54 insurgents in the fiercest battle since Saddam Hussein’s government fell nearly eight months ago, but townspeople disputed that claim, saying only about nine Iraqis were killed in the battle Sunday, most of them noncombatants.

Frankly, I don’t accept either version at face value.
At any rate, this isn’t good:

“All the people in town today are asking for revenge,” said Majid Fadel al-Samarai, 50, an emergency-room worker at the Samarra General Hospital who said he counted nine dead people at the hospital on Sunday. “They want to kill the Americans like they killed our civilians. Give me a gun, and I will also fight.”

And that’s a middle-aged emergency-room worker. Sheesh.

Political Vocabulary: “Strengthen”

Senator Chuck Hagel, one of a handful of “moderate” Senate Republicans who doesn’t reflexively accept everything Karl Rove and Paul Wolfowitz trots out, wrote a recent editorial explaining why he voted against the Medicare reform bill. Hagel restates several typical objections to the bill: it favors special interests, lack of cost controls, confusing provisions, it isn’t tailored to fix today’s problems.
But the thing about this piece that caught my attention as much as anything was the title: “This Measure Will Not Strengthen Medicare.”
Nearly every time there’s a movement to change some program, politicians start talking about strengthening it. What does that mean? Does it mean anything?
The dictionary defines strengthen simply as “to make stronger” and more broadly as increasing the “capacity for exertion or endurance.” I think one might reasonably infer from this that when politicians talk about strengthening Medicare, they’re generally talking about extending the life or usefulness of Medicare.
So what does that mean? Given the direction of health care costs, the only way to prolong the life of government programs is to pour a bunch more money into them, which is one thing this Medicare bill does.
So why don’t politicians simply say the bill pours a lot more money into Medicare?
Clearly Republicans don’t want to run around bragging to their base how much they increased Medicare spending, because some voters don’t like that. Furthermore, this bill isn’t all about more spending; it also includes some provisions to privatize Medicare.
So why don’t the politicians talk about how the bill attempts to privatize Medicare? Because many voters are basically happy with Medicare and don’t want Congress to radically change it.
Since none of the things this bill does makes everyone happy, politicians don’t want to describe what the bill actually does because that will alienate voters. So instead they use a nebulous term like strengthen in the hope that voters will individually project whatever meaning he or she wants upon this term. That way, everyone is happy.
Anyone in favor of strengthening our military?