How far back does one have to go to reach what is considered ancient history? One hundred years? Five hundred? One thousand?
If you’re talking about the World-Wide Web, it’s more like five years. And because it’s made of computer files, rather than bricks or parchment, much of it simply vanishes over time as it is replaced by newer files.
Or does it?
If you do a little digging through the Internet Archive, you can find archived versions of stored websites going back to 1996.
So take a nastalgic trip “wayback” to the 90’s. And remember cyberspace as it was back in the good old days.
UPDATE: This site really does store interesting stuff. I’ve uncovered a real blast from the past: my old website from the UT era. Let’s hope that that gem is being saved for perpetuity.

MSNBC.com must be pretty proud of itself for this story:

The civilian Blackhawk helicopters deployed in January to help defend the skies over the nation�s capital are on round-the-clock coverage in the wake of an MSNBC.com story that described how the choppers were only providing partial coverage.

If you happen to miss the credit in the story’s first sentence, you have three more chances to pick up it in the next three paragraphs.
The funny part is that if you manage to make it to the end of the piece–the writing makes that feat a real chore–you find out that the entire program might not be a very effective security measure:

But some question whether the Blackhawks are needed at all. At the very least, questions about administration of the ADIZ [(Washington) Air Defense Identification Zone] are giving rise to questions about the entire air security complex that has grown up around the capital area.
. . .
“I�m not denying that someone could do some damage with a [general aviation] airplane,” [Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association spokesperson Warren] Morningstar said. “But is the potential for that damage and the potential for that risk so great as to require all the procedures that we�ve put into place right now in the Washington area? We�re not convinced that it is,” he said.

Oh well, no reason to let those details get in the way of a self-inflicted pat on the back, is there?

There’s been quite a bit of recent chatter on whether or not the person(s) who leaked Valerie Plame’s identity as a CIA operative will be caught by government investigators.
The easiest way to find out who leaked the information would simply be to ask Robert Novak and the other journalists, if any, who disclosed it to them.
Undoubtedly, any journalist so ordered would assert that he or she did not have to disclose the source because it’s protected by a First Amendment “reporter’s privilege.” That is, the First Amendment interest in aggressive news gathering and dissemination justifies granting reporters the right to keep news sources confidential.
Would a claim of reporter’s privilege hold up in the Plame investigation? A ruling by the D.C. District Court earlier this month suggests that it would not. In Dr. Wen Ho Lee v. U.S. Department of Justice the court ruled that Dr. Lee could depose several journalists in order to find out who leaked personal information to them from his Department of Energy files.
Lee is not completely analogous to the Plame situation. But because the latter is a criminal, rather than a civil investigation, an even stronger case might be made that the privilege should be rejected.
Of course the journalists might simply refuse to divulge their sources, regardless of a court order to testify. But the government might Constitutionally have the authority to order such testimony, if it so chooses.
Via The Spy Game.

A couple days ago Kevin Drum asked if we are approaching “the end of work.” A subpart to that question might be: Are we approaching the end of manufacturing jobs?
America’s ongoing manufacturing employment decline has been largely attributed to advances in technology and foreign competition. But according to a recent report, the trimming of factory payrolls has been a worldwide phenomenon. Even more striking are the job numbers from China, which due to its large trade surplus with America, has been branded a key contributor to American job loss:

According to the analysis, between 1995 and 2002 roughly 22 million jobs were lost globally, a decline of 11 percent. Two million U.S. manufacturing jobs were lost in that period, matching the 11 percent drop. Manufacturing employment in the 17 largest economies other than China fell a little more than 7 percent, to 89 million in 2002 from 96 million in 1995. In contrast, China’s fell a whopping 15 percent in the period, to 83 million in 2002 from 98 million in 1995.

I was surprised to China has lost that many jobs, given the competitive advantages it has with a cheap currency and a low wage workforce.
What’s the prognosis for manufacturing employment? Not good, says economist Joseph Carson:

“Merely lowering operating costs is not enough for businesses to survive today. Enormous gains in technology have raised the bar on global competitiveness, punishing firms with outmoded facilities regardless of their location,” the report continues. “The giant sucking sound being heard today is not just in the U.S., but across the globe.
“We don’t see the pressure stopping anytime soon.”

Via HobbsOnline A.M.

. . . to Say Uncle, whose “boys can swim.”