{"id":1288,"date":"2004-11-11T14:49:53","date_gmt":"2004-11-11T19:49:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wordpress\/2004\/11\/fcc_regulation_mess\/"},"modified":"2004-11-11T14:49:53","modified_gmt":"2004-11-11T19:49:53","slug":"fcc_regulation_mess","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/2004\/11\/fcc_regulation_mess\/","title":{"rendered":"FCC Regulation Mess"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>TV stations are not airing <i>Saving Private Ryan<\/i> <a title=\"TV stations cancel 'Saving Private Ryan'\" href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/life\/television\/news\/2004-11-11-private-ryan_x.htm\">because of the FCC<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Many ABC affiliates around the country have announced that they won&#8217;t take part in the network&#8217;s Veterans Day airing of Saving Private Ryan, saying the acclaimed film&#8217;s violence and language could draw sanctions from the Federal Communications Commission.<br \/>\n. . .<br \/>\nIn a statement on WSB-TV&#8217;s Web site, the Atlanta station&#8217;s vice president and general manager, Greg Stone, cited a March ruling in which the FCC said an expletive uttered by rock star Bono during NBC&#8217;s live airing of the 2003 Golden Globe Awards was both indecent and profane.<br \/>\nThe agency made it clear then that virtually any use of the F-word \ufffd which is used repeatedly in Saving Private Ryan\ufffd was inappropriate for over-the-air radio and television.<br \/>\nThe Bono case &#8220;reversed years of prior policy that the context of language matters,&#8221; Stone said. He added that broadcasters could not get any clarification from the FCC on whether the movie violates the standard.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It would be bad enough if the FCC simply banned the broadcast of profane language.  But , if possible, the FCC has done something even worse by making the rules so murky that broadcasters don&#8217;t even know what they are allowed to air.  Government agencies are supposed to promulgate clear policies so people know if their conduct is lawful.  The broadcast decency standards are now a confusing mess.  Nice going, FCC.<br \/>\nOh, then there&#8217;s this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[Ray] Cole [president of Citadel Communications] cited recent FCC actions and last week&#8217;s re-election of President Bush as reasons for replacing Saving Private Ryan on Thursday with a music program and the TV movie Return to Mayberry.<br \/>\n&#8220;We&#8217;re just coming off an election where moral issues were cited as a reason by people voting one way or another and, in my opinion, the commissioners are fearful of the new Congress,&#8221; Cole said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Great.  Thanks to message sent by supposed &#8220;values&#8221; voters, TV broadcasters are now afraid of airing programs which illustrate the deadly consequences of the war policies these same &#8220;values&#8221; voters support.<br \/>\nYes, isn&#8217;t it great that our courageous leader doesn&#8217;t have any inhibitions in launching a war on the other side of the globe?  Just don&#8217;t show us what such a war actually does.  How about a rebroadcast of <i>Return to Mayberry<\/i> to help us celebrate the American victory in Fallujah?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<a href=\"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/2004\/11\/fcc_regulation_mess\/\" rel=\"bookmark\" title=\"Permalink to FCC Regulation Mess\"><p>TV stations are not airing Saving Private Ryan because of the FCC: Many ABC affiliates around the country have announced that they won&#8217;t take part in the network&#8217;s Veterans Day airing of Saving Private Ryan, saying the acclaimed film&#8217;s violence and language could draw sanctions from the Federal Communications Commission. . . . In a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n<\/a>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1288","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"h-entry","8":"hentry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1288\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.brianarner.com\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}